Monday, July 22, 2019

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country - Review

Everybody's human.
Spoilers.


I don't know if I actually re-watched this not that long ago already or if this is just a bit more memorable than the previous movies, but everything felt really familiar when I re-watched The Undiscovered Country the other night. Released in 1991 it's also the first movie in the series to be released when I was old enough to possibly remember (6 years). I don't, probably because I was still only into Disney movies at that point…

The Undiscovered Country is extra interesting because to me it really is a good example of what good direction and production can do to a movie. This movie has all the possibilities to be a slog and a snore, but it manages to keep the intensity and tempo going throughout. It's obvious from the first scene that it's a comment on the relation between east and west (on actual Earth, as in USA vs Soviet) so again with the political commentary! This one does it so gracefully too, while the reference is obvious as day the end result is neither black and white nor on the nose with right answers. This is Star Trek using its voice in the best kind of way, letting the characters stand as examples of the human nature the way it was always intended. I have been nagging on about character development and relations in my previous reviews, well here they are front and center and it's respectfully and well done.

It starts after what feels like an eternal intro of just names scrolling past with some music, making me think I've accidentally jumped the movie to the credits, with us seeing Sulu as the captain of the Excelsior when they're suddenly hit by a shockwave. They find out that the shockwave originated from the Klingon moon Praxis, but the moon itself seems to be nowhere to be found. It seems like a major disaster has struck the moon which has resulted in a massive energy crisis on the Klingon home world of Kronos. The Klingon home world has basically about 50 years left to exist before it can't sustain life anymore, but when asked about it the Klingons just want to hush it down. Sounds familiar? It is pretty much ad verbatim what happened with the Soviet and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. When this movie was written and filmed, Soviet still existed but I'm sure everyone knew where it was heading. This movie couldn't have been better timed.

Kirk, who is back to captaining the Enterprise, and his crew are three months from retiring when they get called back to Federation HQ for a debriefing on the situation on Kronos. They get told that the long standing war with the Klingons have finally come to an end and that the Klingons are dying. Kirk, who has never liked the Klingons, is visibly happy with the news. The movie refers back to the death of his son from The Search of Spock to explain is animosity, but the hatred runs a lot deeper and farther back than that of course. Kirk was already a big enemy of the Klingons in the series, but it's not difficult to see that the murdering of his son was the final straw that made any possibility of Kirk thinking otherwise impossible. It's unfortunate that the event happens in such a throw away scene in what is among the worst Star Trek movies (read my review of that to see why), but Kirk plays out all his hatred so well in this movie.

Dreamy eyes and curly hair… he didn't get much from his father.

Spock, who has been missing so far, shows up to explain that there is a possibility now to extend a helping hand from the Federation to the Klingon Empire, to show them and the rest of the Universe really that this is what the Federation is all about. They even help former enemies in need. Many, including Kirk, are strongly opposed to this idea, fearing that the Klingons would see this as a weakness and abuse it to their own benefit. Nonetheless, a chancellor Gorkon is going to be escorted through Federation space by none other than Kirk and his Enterprise team.

Kirk is fuming and has a really great scene with Spock where he basically tells him that he feels betraid by Spock even suggesting such a thing. This might be the first, or at least one of very few scenes, where we see their friendship being tried hard. Both Shatner and Nimoy play it out perfectly and when Spock tries to reason with Kirk by telling him that the Klingons are dying Kirk says his now iconic "Let them die!" with such intensity, we believe without a doubt that he truly feels that way. This first act is absolutely amazing at building up the tension and the stakes even though it's really "only" about some chancellor coming on board the Enterprise. It's done superbly with skilled musical scoring, dialogue writing, acting and direction.

New on board the ship is Lt Valeris, a Vulcan who has distinguished herself at the academy and who we soon find out Spock intends to succeed him as the science officer on board. Valeris and Spock have an interesting and significant conversation early in the movie. One of the most important aspects of it is to show how much Spock has grown and changed as a character. From practically despising his human side (and it's still not something he embraces), when he at one point tells Valeris the also now famous quote "Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the end" we see how far he has travelled in his journey to understand the human mind and his own place within it.

BFFs. Except not forever.

When the chancellor is beamed aboard he is joined by his daughter Azetbur, General Chang and some random warriors. General Chang, played by a Christopher Plummer who clearly enjoys the role, immediately makes an impression with his interaction with Kirk which is passively aggressive in a way that a Swede like me (masters of massive aggressiveness) really enjoys. Without saying it clearly, it is obvious that Chang understands Kirk and that Kirk would rather see them all dead than helping them. What I love about it is that rather than going "oh yeah, there is the villain" you'll go "oh hmm, he clearly is someone to keep an eye on".

A tense first meeting is followed by an even tenser dinner reception in which Azetbur criticizes the humans for their arrogance and presumption that everyone wants to live their life the way they do. What a sweet and not overly subtle punch in the gut of Americanism and the politics of USA of that day.

One interesting aspect about this movie that soon becomes a bit of a confusion are the Klingons themselves. The first couple ones that we see in the movie look very human-like, with small ridges. At first I thought they were using the classical TOS design, but later on in the movie we get a couple of Klingons that look more like the ones in TNG. I don't know if the intention was to make a bridge-over of sorts between the two styles, showcasing both as an explanation for the difference (other explanations have been given, I know) but the end result is more befuddling. It seems then as if some actors just refused the more invasive Klingon make up and were allowed a milder version, but to be fair I almost prefer it that way. Without digressing too far, the way the Klingons turn out in TNG, DS9 and VOY, they're almost too much of a caricature and very difficult to take seriously. That is alright for a lot of what they do, but sometimes I end up feeling the 90's Klingons are a lot more stupid than they are cool.

Chang first had a stint as a bad-guy in Street Fighter.

These scenes between the Klingons and the Federation are tense and well done, but before we have to worry about things going too talky-talky and political the movie steps up the next gear. Suddenly the Enterprise fires torpedoes at the chancellors Bird of Prey, rendering the gravitational field on board non-operational. Two individuals in full Federation space suits, with gravitational boots and masking their faces, walk around shooting Klingons on board but we quickly find out their real target is chancellor Gorkon. When they've shot him they beam back off the Klingon ship and back on board the Enterprise is Kirk and crew completely at a loss as to what just happened. Kirk is trying to figure out whether the shots were actually fired from the Enterprise, getting the answer that the computer says yes.

Kirk and McCoy beam over to see if they can help out and start solving the massive diplomatic disaster that just happened. McCoy tries to save Gorkon but fails and Chang arrests them both for the murder. Fortunately Spock has put a glaringly obvious tracking device onto Kirks shoulder, which for some reason the Klingons don't bother removing. This is one of the few plot holes in the movie fortunately, so I'll let it slide.

Kirk and McCoy get Worf as their "lawyer", I use that term lightly because it is clear that the trial is more of a farce than meant to be taken seriously. While they don't get executed, which I guess must be seen as extremely lenient in any Klingon sentencing, they do get sent to the penal colony of Rura Penthe, which is pretty much the same thing as a death sentence and so obviously a reference to the Soviet Gulag they even refer to it as the "Klingon Gulag" in the movie. The Klingons make clear that any attempt to rescue them will be seen as an act of war.

Spock has taken over command of the Enterprise and Starfleet is ordering them to come back. Spock and the crew understandably have other ideas as they intend to rescue Kirk and McCoy but also reveal who is the real culprit. Spock uses some great deductive reasoning to come to the conclusion that the shots must've been fired by another ship in close vicinity to the Enterprise that was also invisible. A Bird of Prey that can fire shots while cloaked perhaps? Spock then further deduces that there must also be enemies on board the Enterprise, since either someone altered the records on the computer, making it looks like the shots were actually fired from there or the shots were in fact fired from there. Once they've made sure that all Enterprises' torpedoes are accounted for they have their answer and the hunt is on. While they do the search on board, they also decide to save Kirk and McCoy from Rura Penthe and head there.

Meanwhile back in Starfleet Headquarters, the plan to possibly send in a team to rescue Kirk and McCoy (despite the Klingon warnings against it) are being presented to the Federation President who, pardon my French, looks like an absolute muppet. I've seen many different make-ups throughout the years of Star Trek but what were they thinking when they came up with this one? What is he supposed to look like anyway? A wise old man? He just looks like someone who fell asleep on some hair gel and got it all over himself. I realize he is part of a species, The Efrosians, who are supposed to look like that but this one just looks so silly it detracts and distracts from every scene he is in. Fun to see Rene Auberjonois (who plays Odo in DS9, but I don't have to tell you that) in a minor role as colonel West though.

Poodle style.

Shift over to Kirk and McCoy who are getting not-so-comfortable on Rura Penthe. The penal colony is on an ice planet meaning it doesn't need more in terms of security than an anti-beam-out-field, everyone else are free to take their chances in the freezing cold. Kirk quickly makes a friend in Martia the Chameloid, aka shapeshifter who quickly agrees in helping them get out of there. Of course it turns out that the whole thing is a set-up, which also of course, Kirk sees through (not that it's hard to do) and confronts Martia. She shapeshifts into Kirk and Kirk gets to have a fun scene trying to kick his "own" ass. "I can't believe I kissed you" he says to Martia looking like him. "Must've been your lifelong ambition!" Martia quips back. Quite right Martia.

Martia's accomplices show up, only to murder her first so that there are no witnesses (what was she thinking really?). Fortunately at this point exactly, Spock has managed to make his way to Kirk and beam them both up before they get shot. Also just before the bad guy henchman reveals who the main bad guy is, but I am sure everyone but Kirk knows it by now. Spock blames himself for getting Kirk into this whole mess and says "you and the doctor might've been killed". "The night is still young", Kirk replies.

On board the Enterprise, the search has led them to two dead crewmen meaning that someone has tried to silence the killers of the chancellor. Spock and Kirk trick this person into revealing themselves and it turns out it is....... Valeris!

The funny thing here is that if you only watch The Undiscovered Country on its own, it's pretty easy to figure out it has to be Valeris who is involved with whatever is going on, simply because she is a new character in a prominent position story-wise. However, if you like me have been chaining these from the first movie, you've been primed into thinking that this is normal because of Saavik. She is a new character who is given a fairly prominent role without it actually amounting to very much. So going into this movie the first time I didn't think Valeris was going to be much more than just another Saavik. Seeing that she turned out to be one of the bad guys actually surprised me.

As they try to interrogate her we get to see Spock show some emotion, he is definitely angry and disappointed in the path she has taken when he had such high hopes for her. This scene is great and believable, throughout the movie we have got to see the two of them interact and have discussions in which Spock is trying to teach Valeris. They have a great exchange in which Valeris tells Spock that she tried to tell him but he hadn't been listening. Spock replies saying that he too had tried to tell her things, but she hadn't been listening either (basically all that stuff about logic not being the end of wisdom). When she won't answer their questions about who the mastermind is Spock engages a forced mind meld with her in another tense and great scene. Kim Cattrall who plays Valeris does a really good job throughout and even though we get little backstory or motivation on why she would act this way, she sells it and it feels believable. Simply put, Valeris is on the same page with Kirk that the Klingons can't be trusted. Interesting turn however, when it turns out that the main bad guy is none other than General Chang, in liaison with some Federation and Romulan parties. The irony of having a truce between these three groups to essentially prevent a truce between these three groups is heavy and brilliant.


Chang turns up with the prototype Bird of Prey that can fire while cloaked and is set to make an easy job out of blowing Kirk out of the skies when the Excelsior, captained by Sulu remember?, shows up to save the day. By taking some of the heat off the Enterprise, the Excelsior is buying them just enough time to modify a torpedo to be able to home in on the Bird of Prey. When the torpedo hits both ships are then able to destroy it without much trouble. The scene is made extra fun by the fact that George Takei basically shows up to save Shatner. Kirk thanks Sulu, and all I can think of is all the animosity between the two behind the scenes. It doesn't show on screen though.

This rather short battle also highlights another thing about Star Trek, namely that the shields of the ships seem to do different things depending on what is needed for the story. In this scene specifically the shields of the Enterprise are up throughout (except right at the end) but the hits from the Bird of Prey still hit the hull. In other fights the shields seem to absorb pretty much anything until they fail. So I've never really understood exactly how the shields work to be honest. Guess it's just one of those things that changes depending on the mood of the writer.

What I haven't mentioned so far is that chancellor Gorkon's daughter Azetbur has taken over his role and moved the peace talk conference to a secret location. Kirk and friends find out where it is and rush there just in time to thwart an assassination attempt on the President. THE END! Almost.

Then we get the ending... and it is THE Ending with a big E. Everyone is about to retire, the Enterprise gets ordered to come back to be decommissioned. This is it. All the actors and all the people watching the movie know that they are turning over the reins to the next group of people, when this movie was released The Next Generation had already been on air for four years. Fortunately, after a fun ride of a movie, they don't botch things here and do something overly sappy or long like in Lord of the Rings. "So this is goodbye" says Chekov. Spock basically suggests they tell Starfleet to "go to hell" and after looking around the room of the bridge at each other they unanimously decide to yet again ignore Starfleet orders to return to dock. When Chekov asks Kirk where they should head next he answers "second star to the right, and straight on til morning". Which apparently is a reference to Peter Pan, I never knew. Until just now. Then Kirk wraps it all up neatly by announcing that the next generation are going to "boldly go where no man, where no one, has gone before".


It's nice and neat and actually quite sad. It's a lovely finishing touch when the credits start with the main actors signatures going across the screen, like they are all literally signing off on this project. We know now that some of them turn up again in other Star Trek projects, but when the movie was released this must've been a very heavy moment for true Star Trek fans.

This movie has a lot in-common with A Voyage Home in that something about it just works. Although a lot of it is essentially material that could've turned out boring, the movie manages to keep a good pace and intensity throughout that never fails to keep my interest. The two movies are completely different in tone, yet there are some key components that they share that could go some way towards explaining why I enjoy them both so much;

1) A contemporary setting. By this I mean that they both place the crew in a story that makes them feel relevant to us here and now (obviously especially at the time of release but they hold up). They manage to find a way to connect the viewer directly with the events taking place, giving us that oh so important feeling of being able to relate.
2) A focus on the relationships between the different characters of the crew. I said it in my review of A Voyage Home as well, but capitalizing on the time we have invested in getting to know these personalities and how they would interact can pay off so much when done well. When done with the respect to the viewer that you believe that they will understand subtle meanings in dialogue simply because we know what these people are like in different situations.
3)Well-written dialogue that make for really fun to watch and memorable scenes, scenes that not only are enjoyable the first time around but that you want to return to.

And when the credits roll you realize what an awesome thing the entire movie manages to pull off in not only being a commentary on the "Undiscovered Country", ie future, of contemporary actual events going on in the world, but also the future of the Star Trek franchise. This is exactly what Star Trek is about. It manages to make it look effortless when it places itself smack in the middle of fiction and reality.

The end result is a worthy and respectful goodbye and definitely well worth watching. 

Images from Wikipedia.com, fanpop.com, trekcore.com, memory-alpha.fandom.net, 

6 comments:

  1. This one always gets me in the feels. We walked into the theatre knowing this was the last hurrah. But that didn't make the final signoff easy.

    Something you may not have known, and which may provide some background, is that Valeris was *supposed* to be Saavik. That's right, Spock's protoge since Wrath would be revealed to be playing with the other team all along. BUT, that's not the only heel-turn. If you observe carefully, you will see Admiral Cartwright in ST IV. It was important to bring in some previous "good guys" so that the betrayal would feel personal. I guess Robin Curtis couldn't return at this time, so they recast the character and renamed her. I wonder if that was Katrall's price for playing the part (i.e. don't tell me I have a second hand role!) or if they just thought we wouldn't buy a complete face-change again.

    But if you think of that, if it had been Saavik instead, that would kind of put a kink in expectations. You're right, "new crewmember" is kind of a giveaweay, but "established character" - now that's betrayal!

    (Robin did make it back eventually to play a Romulan agent disguised as a Vulcan scientisst - I think it was in DS9 but it could have been TNG)

    I've always felt that the gradiations between smooth-headed and ridge-headed Klingons provided some decent "segue" between the Klingons of TMP and the Klingons of TOS. I always appreciated the explanation they provided in the John M. Ford book, "The Final Reflection" better, but that book was only canonical for the RPG and never for the series or movies. It's a shame, those were a lot more interesting than the on-screen ones ever were.

    I wasn't awair that that was Rene as Colenal West, but now that you said that it IS obvious :) But maybe you didn't realize that President Poodle Style was played by Kurtwood Smith, 20 pounds of make-up, and 30 pounds of hair! :)

    I think the thing that makes this movie and IV work is the dialog - it's sharp and punchy and not at all forced, which III and V are. And, as in IV, we see the entire crew contributing in a way that makes it obvious why the Enterprise is as much a force as her Captain. The one scene where they're debating the facts of the case on the bridge is a highlight for me.

    While STVI was super topical in its time, it points to an aspect of Star Trek that might be as painfully topical now - what of the Klingon refugees? I mean, both of our continents are undgoing painful episodes with regards to refugees. I think Star Trek has something to say about that (and it just may be doing so in the Picard series, in that case it's Romulans).

    Finally, I am super amused at your observation about Swedish passive-agressiveness. As a devops engineer supporting a worldwide staff of developers, I had to chuckle at that considering recent experiences with our team in Sweden. I'll have to take that into account now, so maybe I've picked up a tool to help me work with those guys better :)

    Thanks again for the new light on some old favorites. Are you continuing into the TNG movies as well?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your comment is great fun to read as always!
    I did not know that about Saavik/Valeris, but yes it definitely explains a lot. And what a surprise out of left field that would've been! It's unfortunate they couldn't do it that way but I actually think they managed to find a good replacement in Valeris and the solution they set on.

    Haha yes, I did recognize Kurtwood Smith. In fact I think that just made it worse because I kept picturing his character from That 70's Show and imagining him being made up like that. Maybe the whole look would've worked better on someone, almost anyone, else.

    You've got me really curious about the Swedish team anecdote now. Feel free to share it if you have the time and desire! But yeah, Swedish passive aggressiveness is rampant, we never say anything straight out and in fact often become absolutely confused and shocked when someone does. Instead we either say nothing at all and go around being annoyed, or sneak it in with sarcasm.


    It's my intention to continue on throughout all the movies in fact, so yeah - TNG and beyond! I definitely wouldn't want to miss out on one of my favorites, First Contact, even it if means wading through movies like Nemesis and Insurrection that I don't remember as being as good. But we'll see how I feel about them now, it was a long time since I saw some of them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Appologies for a dupe post if this is a dupe, but it looks like my comment didn't take. Blogger gets weirder by the day.

    I agree on Valeris. Honestly I'll watch Kim Catrell in anything, but she does a really good Evil Vulcan.

    So my Swedish Engineer story:

    I work at a company that has offices all over the world. Recently, we were instructed to move all development systems onto central corporate systems. This means that the Swedes, who have a local instance of TeamCity for their Continuous Integration system, had to move onto our corporate Jenkins instance.

    Since they really didn't want to do that, but also couldn't defy the bosses, they instead found multiple issues - real and imagined - in the corporate system (which I must emphasize, hosts thousands of build jobs from dozens of teams without any problem).

    Two months after they're supposed to be migrated, they're still finding any excuse to not do so and make it look like our fault. Our boss knows the score, so we're not in hot water, but of course if we fail to jump when the Swedes complain, it's our bad.

    So that's my Swedish Engineer story. They're not all like that, but when they are, they REALLY are :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha that is hilarious. Yeah that sounds pretty Swedish alright. I wonder how long they will be able to keep that up for though ^^

      Delete
  4. Well, they've got one adult on the team so when I work with him we do make progress. Unfortunately he's on holiday for a month so they're starting to get angry again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For some people there is nothing more painful than change. And then once it is done they're probably also going to agree that the new system works just fine. I encounter this a lot in my field of work myself. You just want to tell them "well it's going to change no matter what, so why not just embrace it?".

      Delete