Friday, June 21, 2019

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier - Review

Row, row, row your boat out of here.
Spoilers.

Non-sensical and non-descript, just like the movie.

I'll be honest, I was kind of dreading this. Not only is The Final Frontier considered to be among the worst of the Star Trek movies, I also remember really not liking it. Interestingly enough though, having re-watched it now for this review, I found a lot more redeeming factors than I ever thought I would. But maybe me going in with the lowest of expectations really helped things along.

Don't get me wrong, this movie is in fact bad. But the main issue here is the story, which is convoluted, boring and honestly makes no sense at all. However, sandwiched in-between a lot of scenes that have straight up bad writing, is a lot of stuff that actually could make this movie worth watching for a Star Trek fan (at least if you've run out of other TOS content to watch). The jargon and banter between Kirk and Co are some of the best they've ever been and we get to see a lot more character development (by other crew members than Kirk) in this movie than in the first three (TMP, TWOK and TSFP).

But seriously, what is up with the story? The movie starts out with a scene of Kirk free climbing some mountain side while McCoy is on the ground, rightly being worried out of his mind about Kirk falling to his death any second. Spock shows up with his rocket shoes just before Kirk falls (arguably also being the cause of Kirk falling) and saves his life. I find that this initial scene epitomizes basically all the pro's and con's that this movie has. In itself it makes little sense and if it's going for realism (within the boundaries of the Star Trek Universe) it is laughable. I don't actually know what age Kirk is supposed to be but Shatner himself was almost 60 when this scene was shot, and while I'm not saying that no 60 year old ever could free climb that far up a vertical mountain side, to suggest that Kirk could is just not very believable (although still in-character that he'd definitely give it a try). Secondly we have Spocks rocket shoes which defy all physics and logic (pun intended), although I'll throw in a caveat for the possibility that they've invented/discovered some alien technology in the future that could work the way they do in this scene. At face value this scene is poorly thought out and realized.



But then, later on in the movie, we get to see that both these things - the rock climbing and the rocket shoes - come in handy again, so this entire scene was set up as a foreshadowing of sorts. Clumsily made so still far from perfect, but at least it gives the existence of the scene a bit of purpose. Also, within it is some decently written dialogue between the characters, allowing them to banter and bounce comments at each other just like we love to see Kirk, Spock and McCoy in action. So what is the end result of the scene? That this movie is going to be a mixed bag, and you need to go into it hoping for light hearted crew-fun, and not a smartly written, well-paced story.

In many ways this movie superficially resembles The Voyage Home this way, where the story takes incredible short-cuts to be able to tell you about a fun adventure of Kirk and his crew. The big difference is that The Voyage Home has the funny and clever dialogue fit in and lift the story, but in the Final Frontier the story and dialogue seem like they've been written by two very different people with two very different movies in mind (the story was in fact co-written by Shatner, Harve Bennett and David Loughery.

I've been trying to stave it off, but at this point I feel I need to go into the story before we move on;
After the rock climbing scene we are taken to the planet Nimbus III, also known as the Planet of Galactic Peace. Nimbus III is, pardon my French, a sandy s*it-hole, and being stationed here should be and is considered a demotion. In the bar of the "town" called Paradise is a dancing cat lady with three boobs that just feels so extremely 80's. Why a planet that seems to lack any basic infrastructure was chosen as the site to advance peace between the Federation, Klingon Empire and Romulan Empire is anyone's guess (no one had tactical advantage possibly). How they think it's going to happen without actually having any diplomats there to do the talking is also a mystery.

Welcome to nothing.

I'm going to correct myself though, there are in fact three diplomats (one from each) and they get kidnapped by the main villain, of sorts, in this movie - an emotional Vulcan named Sybok, who also turns out to be Spocks half-brother (Spock seems to have mystery siblings all over the galaxy). Kirk and crew get called back from shore leave to take a barely functional Enterprise to rescue these three hostages. Kirk asks if there are no better ships and gets the answer that there are better ships but no better commander. So why not give Kirk one of the better ships? Anyway... they don't do that. On the way to the bridge Kirk comments that he needs a shower and Spock turn to him and says "yes".

Meanwhile, a random Klingon Bird of Prey discovers the Enterprise, their mission and the fact that Kirk is on the ship and decides to pursue them to kill Kirk for glory. It's ok if you completely forget about the Klingons because they barely fill any function in this movie at all.

Since the teleporters aren't working, Kirk and crew need to go down to the surface of Nimbus III in a shuttle to do the rescue and we get to see Uhura dance naked in the desert moonlight and Spock do a neck pinch on a horse. Kirk gets attacked by the cat lady from the bar and she has some absolutely astonishingly bad sound effects.

When Kirk is about to rescue the hostages it turns out the entire thing was just a ruse, the hostages were in on it with Sybok. What did they want? A starship, and the Enterprise will do. What are they going to do with it? Take it to Sha Ka Ree, or as it is called in Terran - Eden. That's right, Sybok is in fact certain he has found the location of Paradise and God itself.

The actor does what he can with a character that needed a lot more work.

On the way back to the Enterprise in the shuttle, the Klingons on the Bird of Prey show up (bet you had forgotten about them already) and threaten to kill them. Kirk outsmarts them and Spock briefly gets a chance to kill Sybok. He chooses not to and when Kirk has an anger fit at him he reveals that Sybok is his brother, but to a Vulcan princess mother. He tells Kirk that Sybok was exiled from Vulcan for his beliefs, but a few scenes later when they talk about Sha Ka Ree he exclaims that trying to find it was the reason Sybok left Vulcan. They get put in the brig but Scotty jail breaks them out of there.

As they try to sneak to regain control of the ship there is a genuinely hilarious scene where Scotty gets captured by knocking himself unconscious on a bulk head - it's so unexpected and silly.


Apparently Eden is located inside something called the Great Barrier from which nothing has ever come out of after entering. Kirk isn't too keen on taking the Enterprise in there, but Sybok has a way of talking people into doing what he wants. He gets all of Kirks crew on his side by allowing them to face their biggest fears and take strength from it. He immediately reminded me of a televangelist in the way he does it, which probably is a good thing since that is where Shatner drew his inspiration. Even though Spock and McCoy go through with Syboks "treatment" they decide to stay with Kirk. Kirk refuses to face his fears and tells Sybok;

"I don't want my pain taken away! I need my pain!"

Which I think really says a lot about Kirk.

The scene where McCoy and Spock get to face their inner fears has potential to be interesting. McCoy feels a lot of pain about letting his ailing father die too soon and Spock feels pain about Sarek thinking he is too human. It's not a scene that makes a lot of sense though, because even though we know Spock struggles a lot with his humanity, even Spock must know that whatever Sarek thinks about humans he still chose to marry and have a child with one. The way the scene plays it out it seems like Sarek really dislikes humans, which clearly isn't the case.

In fact, Sarek and Amanda is one of the better written love stories in Star Trek.

The scene as a whole isn't well designed either, as it's not entirely clear what exactly happens. Are they seeing visions? Can other people see what they see? It is hinted that they can, but how does that work?

When Kirk finds out that Sybok is searching for God he tells him that he is mad. "Am I?" Sybok asks, with a great and telling expression on his face. The actor for Sybok, Laurence Luckinbill, really nails it there.

They go into the Great Barrier without any trouble and find a planet. Sybok hands over the control to Enterprise back to Kirk saying that now that they are here he is convinced that Kirk wants to explore the planet too. He's not wrong. "If we are going to do it, we're doing it by the book" Kirk says, only to say "Ok, we'll play it your way" to Sybok the scene after. The people still on board are watching the people on the planet on the view screen from a camera angle they couldn't possibly achieve.

We never get an explanation to how Sybok figured out God would be at this specific place, but they do find something. At first they think it actually is God, but Kirk (of course) starts to question it and when it responds malevolently they realize it's just some alien creature trying to use them to leave the Great Barrier. Sybok sacrifices himself by throwing himself at the alien, thus saving the others although I have no idea how that works. It also makes you wonder what happened to every other ship that entered this area. What should be the great climax and raison d'être for this movie is over and dealt with in a matter of minutes and it feels absolutely pointless.

A lot of work must've gone into that beard.

But! We mustn't forget about the Klingons! They show up, having pursued the Enterprise all the way into the Great Barrier and...!... Get talked into not attacking by the diplomat Klingon from Nimbus III who is on Enterprise. So... the Klingon presence filled zero real purpose and fizzled out into nothing, just as pretty much everything else in this story line.

The story is incomprehensible and uninteresting, and the story isn't the only problem with this movie. The special effects are among the ugliest I've seen (though not Jaws: The Revenge ugly) and definitely worse than all of the previous movies. There is a scene of the shuttle craft where I genuinely cringed. We are far from the majestic beauty and storytelling from The Motion Picture here.

But if you try to ignore what the movie is trying to tell you, and you really should, there are quite a few really fun and delightful scenes with Kirk and Co just being everything that made TOS so much fun to watch. In many ways it nails some of the same joyfulness of The Voyage Home, but without the interesting and clever framework to hold it together.

And there you have it - overall this movie deserves all the bad reviews it has gotten. But, I'll be honest, even though the story is bad it's still not as boring as The Search For Spock and this movie also has a lot more fun scenes between the crew than that movie has. So in the end I've actually got to say that this isn't the worst Star Trek movie and not even the worst of the first five. I can't say I recommend watching it, but it does have some redeeming factors to it and it ended up being less horrible than I had expected. It's might not be praise but it's something.

Thoughts had when watching this movie;
  • Wait a minute, didn't Sybok have long hair just now? And when they land on the God-planet he suddenly has short hair.

Images from IMDB.com, memory-alpha.fandom.com, tor.com, laymansbible.wordpress.com.

5 comments:

  1. Well, first of all, I won't disagree - this was a bad movie. A lot of people went so far as to call the next one "ST IV: The Apology". And yet, in repeated viewings (usually when extremely bored), there are a few things that are endearing.

    I want to jump in on the "Kirk & Co. get things to do" bit, first of all. While it's true that they had things to do, some of them were truly cringe-worthy for long-time fans; such as Scotty's monologue just before he clocked himself. The movie was full of stuff like that.

    But moving along.

    * Did you know that Shatner was afraid of heights? Considering that he directed, one can only imagine the level of projection involved here. Also:

    https://youtu.be/tkBVDh7my9Q

    * What is up with the story? Well, there was a writer's strike, as well as a Teamster's Union strike during the production of this movie. Because of that, the entire ending was revamped.

    I say that, but, honestly, no ending could have saved the rest of this movie, I think you'll agree.

    * Shatner was 60, but also in the midst of his T.J. Hooker series. So much jumping and running about. In fact, DeForest Kelley was quite happy with the level of activity in this movie. He felt he had been passed by for this kind of stuff because of his age, and was grateful for the chance to spread his wings, as it were.

    * I just figure any civilization that can make starships that acceperate to lightspeed within a few seconds will be able to handle rocket boots. But boy howdy they're lame.

    * Shatner wrote the main story. Bennett was brought in by Shatner to help edit the film down after Paramount rejected the 2-hour original cut. Yes, it could have been longer. Bennett's original cut horrified Shatner, but they worked things out. That's also how they got Bennett in the first place. Nimoy had made him feel pretty damned unappreciated, so he was DONE with ST movies. Shatner swung for the bleachers and won him over.

    * CBS, which had the TV rights for this movie, edited the three-breasted cat chick out.

    (TBD)

    ReplyDelete
  2. (con't)

    * David Warner plays the Terran ambassador in this movie. You may recognize him as the Klingon Chancellor in the next movie. The guy that played the Klingon ambassador went on to play Kim'Pek in TNG later on (I think that was the arc where Worf was accused of treason to the Empire).

    * Random Klingon Bird of Prey was required as a rescue vehicle later on. That's its entire purpose in this movie.

    * The escape from Nimbus features Sulu at his best. "Actually, this is my first attempt." Too bad the special effects weren't up to that line. Takei actually declined to do this movie because he didn't want to be directed by Shatner. Shatner reached out to him and talked him into it. He grudgingly admitted later that Shatner was a pretty good director.

    * I've always read "I don't want my pain taken away! I need my pain!" to be a commentary on how we are the sum of our past trials - learning by failing, that sort of thing. I think it says a lot about what it means to be Human.

    * Yeah, the flashbacks were pretty awkwards. Let's not go into how Spock would have any memory or awareness of his own birth.

    * The whole God scene has one of my favorite lines of the movie: "Why does God need a Starship?"

    * I've always figured Sybock was sensing some sort of divine mind meld.

    * By the way, the third episode of Star Trek (Where No Man has Gone Before) tells us that the Great Barrier is at the edge of the galaxy, a notion later reinforced in the 2nd season episode, By Any Other Name. A lot of angst was to be had by Trekkies when they said that The Great Barrier was a the center of the Galaxy. Something that even then we knew was complete bullshit.

    * I find it interesting that you call back to TMP for its magesty etc when compared to this one. If there's anything we lost in the progression of ST movies, that would wrap it right up. WoK had a certain "dignity" to it but after that we went for laughs instead of dignity. At least how I see it. Don't get me wrong, I like ST IV, but it's more a dramedy than a drama.

    So let me bookend this with my feelings on what the "message" of the movie was. I've had years and repeated viewings to come to this conclusion. I feel that the big thing they were on about here was the kinship of the Bit Three, or, as a lot of fans called them, The Triumvirate. "I lost a brother once," Kirk muses. "I was lucky. I got him back." He's not going on about Sam Kirk. He's talking about Spock, who "gets" it.

    THESE THREE GUYS ... are brothers of the heart. A lot of ST novelists have made a big deal about this relationship (Looking at you, Marshak and Culbreath) and this movie writes that concept in the large. "You were never alone", Spock tells Kirk, which is true. And those words kind of haunt us in First Contact, don't they?


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Those were some nice pointers/anecdotes, thanks a lot for them! I think you hit it home with your wrap up - they went with laughs instead of dignity. The "problem" about the movie format is that in the series they can alternate between the silly and more serious stories (although I feel like The Voyage Home showed that these do not need to be mutually exclusive). I do like the silliness of Star Trek and for instance feel like Discovery has, so far at least, had way too little of it and comes off with the feeling of taking itself too seriously instead. Maybe this is some of the critique that TMP got as well, but as you know I disagree with those opinions.

      I know this movie had a very troubled production, but so did almost every ST movie more or less. This probably a lot more than the others, either the end result definitely hints at that being part of a the issue.

      I find that Shatners core idea here isn't all bad and in line with some of the TOS series episodes. But like I repeat a lot in the review, nothing feels well realized or like it comes to fruition. There isn't a pay off to anything that happens in the movie really. But at least it is somewhat-entertaining-bad and not completely-forgettable-bad like I find The Search For Spock to be. But yes, the final quote says a lot about what the thought behind the movie was.

      Delete
  3. Yeah, it's not a good movie, and from what I'd heard when I saw it back in the theater, they spent so much money on special effects that they had to cut the budget everywhere else. And boy, does it show.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And then the effects are not even good… it's that phase when they started to be able to use CGI but it just wasn't good looking but they burnt all their money on that anyway.

      Delete